Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Sanborn, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Sanborn, NY.
| Data | Parker | Sanborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 1,499 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $75,109 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Sanborn
- The population in Sanborn is higher at 1,499, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.2 years in Sanborn.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $75,109 in Sanborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Sanborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanborn at 9%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Sanborn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Sanborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Sanborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Sanborn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 4% compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanborn at 94% compared to 85% in Parker.
- Both Parker and Sanborn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- Both Parker and Sanborn have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Sanborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Sanborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Sanborn
- In Sanborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sanborn at 24.9% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Sanborn has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 20.0% in Sanborn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 32.9% in Sanborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanborn at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Sanborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 3.9% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 19.6% (294) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 16.0% (240) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 13.9% (209) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Sanborn
- In Sanborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Sanborn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanborn at 16.0%, compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- In Sanborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.