Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Salt lake city, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Salt lake city, UT.
Data | Parker | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,221 | 204,657 |
Median Age | 39.3 years | 32.5 years |
Median Income | $83,864 | $72,357 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Salt lake city
- The population in Salt lake city is higher at 204,657, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $72,357 in Salt lake city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
- The poverty level is higher in Salt lake city at 13%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Salt lake city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Salt lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parker | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | 85 | 63 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Salt lake city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 4% compared to 3% in Salt lake city.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 63% in Salt lake city.
- In Salt lake city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Salt lake city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Salt lake city at 8%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 1% in Salt lake city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parker | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 17.8% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Salt lake city
- In Salt lake city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Salt lake city at 26.2% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 16.4% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 14.8% in Salt lake city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 31.8% in Salt lake city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Salt lake city at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parker | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.3% (2,733) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 9.3% (19,020) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 10.5% (21,475) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 33.0% (67,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Salt lake city
- In Salt lake city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
- In Salt lake city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.