Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Lovejoy, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Lovejoy, GA.
| Data | Parker | Lovejoy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $59,184 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 13.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Lovejoy
- The population in Lovejoy is higher at 11,638, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 26.5 years in Lovejoy.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $59,184 in Lovejoy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 13.0% in Lovejoy.
- The poverty level is higher in Lovejoy at 12%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Lovejoy has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Lovejoy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Lovejoy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 70 |
| White | 85 | 15 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Lovejoy
- In Lovejoy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 4% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 15% in Lovejoy.
- Both Parker and Lovejoy have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Lovejoy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lovejoy at 5%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Lovejoy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Lovejoy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Lovejoy
- In Lovejoy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Lovejoy.
- Lovejoy has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 14.0% in Lovejoy.
- Lovejoy has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lovejoy at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Lovejoy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.3% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 7.5% (872) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 6.4% (748) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 12.2% (1,420) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Lovejoy
- In Lovejoy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 7.5% in Lovejoy.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 6.4% in Lovejoy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 12.2% in Lovejoy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.