Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Keizer, OR.
| Data | Parker | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 38,704 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $75,753 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $75,753 in Keizer.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- The poverty level is higher in Keizer at 10%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Keizer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 4% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 1% in Keizer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Keizer has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.8% (685) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 12.7% (4,898) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 13.9% (5,363) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keizer at 13.9%, compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.