Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Felicity, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Felicity, OH.
| Data | Parker | Felicity |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,221 | 653 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,864 | $34,821 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Felicity
- In Parker, the population is higher at 1,221, compared to 653 in Felicity.
- The median age in Felicity is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 39.3 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $34,821 in Felicity.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 26.0% in Felicity.
- The poverty level is higher in Felicity at 10%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Felicity has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Felicity provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Felicity |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 85 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Felicity
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 4% compared to 0% in Felicity.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Felicity at 100% compared to 85% in Parker.
- Both Parker and Felicity have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 0% in Felicity.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 4% compared to 0% in Felicity.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Felicity.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Felicity |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Felicity
- In Felicity, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Felicity at 25.3% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Felicity has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 19.8% in Felicity.
- Felicity has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Felicity at 31.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Felicity |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 18.2% (119) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 25.7% (168) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 3.5% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Felicity
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Felicity.
- In Felicity, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Felicity at 25.7%, compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 3.5% in Felicity.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.