Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Elizabeth, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Elizabeth, NJ.
Data | Parker | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,221 | 134,283 |
Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $83,864 | $59,939 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Elizabeth
- The population in Elizabeth is higher at 134,283, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.7 years in Elizabeth.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $59,939 in Elizabeth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Elizabeth.
- The poverty level is higher in Elizabeth at 12%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Elizabeth has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Elizabeth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parker | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 18 |
White | 85 | 11 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 66 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Elizabeth
- In Elizabeth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 4% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 11% in Elizabeth.
- In Elizabeth, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Elizabeth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elizabeth at 14%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 1% in Elizabeth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parker | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 14.5% |
Depression | 17.8% | 18.0% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 33.9% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Elizabeth
- In Elizabeth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elizabeth at 18.0% versus 17.8% in Parker.
- Elizabeth has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 15.0% in Elizabeth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 33.9% in Elizabeth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elizabeth at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parker | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 2.6% (3,513) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 23.7% (31,770) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 31.8% (42,757) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 9.2% (12,394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Elizabeth
- In Elizabeth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Elizabeth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elizabeth at 31.8%, compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 9.2% in Elizabeth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.