Demographics details for Parker, PA vs Yadkinville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, PA vs Yadkinville, NC.
| Data | Parker | Yadkinville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 690 | 2,997 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $46,875 | $41,148 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Yadkinville
- The population in Yadkinville is higher at 2,997, compared to 690 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 38.8 years in Yadkinville.
- Parker has a higher median income of $46,875 compared to $41,148 in Yadkinville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Yadkinville.
- The poverty level is higher in Yadkinville at 15%, compared to 12% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Yadkinville.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Yadkinville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Yadkinville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8 |
| White | 97 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Yadkinville
- In Yadkinville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 60% in Yadkinville.
- Both Parker and Yadkinville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Yadkinville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yadkinville at 7%, compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Yadkinville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Yadkinville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Yadkinville
- More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.5% in Yadkinville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 24.0% compared to 23.9% in Yadkinville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 21.5% compared to 17.9% in Yadkinville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.5% compared to 17.2% in Yadkinville.
- Yadkinville has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 36.2% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parker at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Yadkinville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Yadkinville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 32.2% (222) | 23.9% (715) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (114) | 17.5% (523) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (57) | 8.1% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Yadkinville
- In Yadkinville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 32.2% compared to 23.9% in Yadkinville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yadkinville at 17.5%, compared to 16.5% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 8.1% in Yadkinville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.