Demographics details for Parker, PA vs Worcester, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, PA vs Worcester, MA.
| Data | Parker | Worcester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 690 | 205,319 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $46,875 | $63,011 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Worcester
- The population in Worcester is higher at 205,319, compared to 690 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011, compared to $46,875 in Parker.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
- The poverty level is identical in both Parker and Worcester at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.8% in Worcester.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Worcester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Worcester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 13 |
| White | 97 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Worcester
- In Worcester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 44% in Worcester.
- In Worcester, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 0% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Worcester at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Worcester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 24.0% compared to 23.1% in Worcester.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 21.5% compared to 17.1% in Worcester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.5% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 36.2% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parker at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Worcester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Worcester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (3,577) |
| High School Diploma | 32.2% (222) | 15.6% (31,987) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (114) | 16.0% (32,925) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (57) | 21.5% (44,155) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 32.2% compared to 15.6% in Worcester.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Worcester.
- In Worcester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 8.3% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.