Demographics details for Parker, PA vs Woodbine, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, PA vs Woodbine, NJ.
| Data | Parker | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 690 | 2,142 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 46.8 years |
| Median Income | $46,875 | $41,167 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Woodbine
- The population in Woodbine is higher at 2,142, compared to 690 in Parker.
- The median age in Woodbine is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 45.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $46,875 compared to $41,167 in Woodbine.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Woodbine.
- Parker has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Woodbine.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Woodbine.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Woodbine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 23 |
| White | 97 | 27 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 27% in Woodbine.
- Both Parker and Woodbine have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Woodbine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 0% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodbine at 20%, compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Woodbine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 27.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.0%.
- Woodbine has a higher smoking rate at 27.6% compared to 21.5% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.5% compared to 16.0% in Woodbine.
- Woodbine has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 36.2% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodbine at 37.0% compared to 16.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.4% (288) |
| High School Diploma | 32.2% (222) | 24.9% (534) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (114) | 44.6% (956) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (57) | 5.3% (113) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 32.2% compared to 24.9% in Woodbine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodbine at 44.6%, compared to 16.5% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 5.3% in Woodbine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.