Demographics details for Parker, PA vs Plainfield, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, PA vs Plainfield, IL.
| Data | Parker | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 690 | 46,243 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,875 | $143,064 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Plainfield
- The population in Plainfield is higher at 46,243, compared to 690 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 37.7 years in Plainfield.
- Plainfield has a higher median income of $143,064, compared to $46,875 in Parker.
- In Plainfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 35.0% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Plainfield.
- Plainfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Plainfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 97 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Plainfield
- In Plainfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 69% in Plainfield.
- In Plainfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Plainfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Plainfield at 5%, compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Plainfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 10.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Plainfield
- More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.7% in Plainfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 24.0% compared to 17.8% in Plainfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 21.5% compared to 10.8% in Plainfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in Plainfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 36.2% compared to 30.4% in Plainfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parker at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Plainfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (213) |
| High School Diploma | 32.2% (222) | 8.9% (4,121) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (114) | 4.8% (2,237) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (57) | 33.1% (15,293) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Plainfield
- In Plainfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 32.2% compared to 8.9% in Plainfield.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 4.8% in Plainfield.
- In Plainfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 8.3% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.