Demographics details for Parker, KS vs Peachtree corners, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Parker, KS vs Peachtree corners, GA.

Data Parker Peachtree corners
Population 233 42,133
Median Age 37.8 years 35.5 years
Median Income $80,250 $74,716
Married Families 73.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.1

Population Comparison: Parker vs Peachtree corners

  • The population in Peachtree corners is higher at 42,133, compared to 233 in Parker.
  • Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.5 years in Peachtree corners.
  • Parker has a higher median income of $80,250 compared to $74,716 in Peachtree corners.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 73.0% compared to 41.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Parker has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Peachtree corners.
  • The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Peachtree corners.

Demographics

Demographics Parker vs Peachtree corners provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Parker Peachtree corners
Black Data is updating 24
White 78 43
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic 14 17
Two or More Races 8 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Peachtree corners

  • In Peachtree corners, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 0% in Parker.
  • Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 43% in Peachtree corners.
  • In Peachtree corners, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Parker.
  • Peachtree corners has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 14% in Parker.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 7% in Peachtree corners.
  • In Peachtree corners, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parker.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Parker Peachtree corners
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 13.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 8.5%
Depression 22.1% 16.7%
Smoking 21.7% 10.6%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 14.9%
Obesity 39.1% 29.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Peachtree corners

  • More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 13.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 22.1% compared to 16.7% in Peachtree corners.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 21.7% compared to 10.6% in Peachtree corners.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Peachtree corners.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 39.1% compared to 29.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Parker at 21.0% compared to 4.0% in Peachtree corners.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Parker Peachtree corners
No Schooling 5.6% (13) 0.4% (150)
High School Diploma 37.8% (88) 10.7% (4,527)
Less than High School 22.3% (52) 8.3% (3,491)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (27) 34.2% (14,398)

Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Peachtree corners

  • A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 0.4% in Peachtree corners.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 37.8% compared to 10.7% in Peachtree corners.
  • More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 8.3% in Peachtree corners.
  • In Peachtree corners, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 11.6% in Parker.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.