Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Springdale, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Springdale, AR.
| Data | Parker | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 87,672 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $59,985 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Springdale
- The population in Springdale is higher at 87,672, compared to 61,222 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 32.1 years in Springdale.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $59,985 in Springdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Springdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Springdale at 10%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.7% in Springdale.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Springdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 73 | 36 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Springdale
- In Springdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 36% in Springdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 3% in Springdale.
- Springdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 12% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springdale at 19%, compared to 8% in Parker.
- In Springdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Springdale
- In Springdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springdale at 25.2% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Springdale has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Springdale.
- Springdale has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springdale at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 2.6% (2,317) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 14.5% (12,683) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 26.6% (23,284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 14.0% (12,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Springdale
- In Springdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- In Springdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springdale at 26.6%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 14.0% in Springdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.