Demographics details for Parker, CO vs South pasadena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs South pasadena, CA.
| Data | Parker | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 25,850 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $127,882 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs South pasadena
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
- The median age in South pasadena is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882, compared to $126,615 in Parker.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Parker and South pasadena at 45.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in South pasadena at 8%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- South pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs South pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 73 | 31 |
| Asian | 5 | 34 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs South pasadena
- In South pasadena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
- In South pasadena, the Asian population stands at 34%, greater than 5% in Parker.
- South pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 12% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South pasadena at 12%, compared to 8% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and South pasadena at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 13.8% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 6.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 20.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs South pasadena
- More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 12.9% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 19.2% compared to 13.8% in South pasadena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 9.8% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 23.7% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South pasadena at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 0.7% (177) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 4.3% (1,111) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 3.0% (766) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 53.2% (13,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs South pasadena
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Parker and South pasadena at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 6.8% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 4.4% compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
- In South pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 32.8% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.