Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Sierra vista, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Sierra vista, AZ.
| Data | Parker | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 45,439 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $70,899 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Sierra vista
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 45,439 in Sierra vista.
- The median age in Sierra vista is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $70,899 in Sierra vista.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Sierra vista.
- The poverty level is higher in Sierra vista at 13%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Sierra vista has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Sierra vista provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8 |
| White | 73 | 48 |
| Asian | 5 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Sierra vista
- In Sierra vista, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 48% in Sierra vista.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 4% in Sierra vista.
- Sierra vista has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 12% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sierra vista at 15%, compared to 8% in Parker.
- In Sierra vista, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Sierra vista
- In Sierra vista, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sierra vista at 20.8% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Sierra vista has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Sierra vista.
- Sierra vista has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sierra vista at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 0.5% (224) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 11.7% (5,296) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 8.2% (3,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 22.8% (10,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Sierra vista
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Sierra vista.
- In Sierra vista, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sierra vista at 8.2%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 22.8% in Sierra vista.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.