Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Porterville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Porterville, CA.
| Data | Parker | Porterville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 62,998 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $55,785 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 14.6 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Porterville
- The population in Porterville is higher at 62,998, compared to 61,222 in Parker.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $55,785 in Porterville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Porterville.
- The poverty level is higher in Porterville at 23%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Porterville has a higher unemployment rate at 14.6% compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Porterville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Porterville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 1 |
| Asian | 5 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Porterville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 2% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 4% in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 12% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Porterville at 21%, compared to 8% in Parker.
- In Porterville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Porterville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Porterville
- In Porterville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Porterville at 20.6% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Porterville has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Porterville.
- Porterville has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Porterville at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Porterville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 2.8% (1,751) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 12.2% (7,695) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 35.0% (22,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 8.0% (5,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Porterville
- In Porterville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- In Porterville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Porterville at 35.0%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.