Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Nanticoke, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Nanticoke, PA.
| Data | Parker | Nanticoke |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 10,607 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $56,238 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 7.2 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Nanticoke
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 10,607 in Nanticoke.
- The median age in Nanticoke is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $56,238 in Nanticoke.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Nanticoke.
- The poverty level is higher in Nanticoke at 12%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Nanticoke has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Nanticoke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Nanticoke |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 73 | 76 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Nanticoke
- In Nanticoke, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Nanticoke at 76% compared to 73% in Parker.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 0% in Nanticoke.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 12% compared to 11% in Nanticoke.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 7% in Nanticoke.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Nanticoke at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Nanticoke |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Nanticoke
- In Nanticoke, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Nanticoke at 23.9% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Nanticoke has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Nanticoke.
- Nanticoke has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nanticoke at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Nanticoke |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 1.3% (140) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 23.7% (2,518) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 19.6% (2,077) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 14.1% (1,491) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Nanticoke
- In Nanticoke, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- In Nanticoke, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Nanticoke at 19.6%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 14.1% in Nanticoke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.