Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Muldraugh, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Muldraugh, KY.
| Data | Parker | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 1,019 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $49,375 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Muldraugh
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 1,019 in Muldraugh.
- The median age in Muldraugh is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $49,375 in Muldraugh.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Muldraugh.
- The poverty level is higher in Muldraugh at 15%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Muldraugh.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Muldraugh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 73 | 83 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Muldraugh
- In Muldraugh, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Muldraugh at 83% compared to 73% in Parker.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 0% in Muldraugh.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 12% compared to 9% in Muldraugh.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 4% in Muldraugh.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Muldraugh at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 30.2% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 27.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Muldraugh
- In Muldraugh, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Muldraugh at 30.2% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Muldraugh has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Muldraugh.
- Muldraugh has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Muldraugh at 40.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 36.4% (371) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 13.7% (140) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 5.1% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Muldraugh
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Muldraugh.
- In Muldraugh, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.4% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Muldraugh at 13.7%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 5.1% in Muldraugh.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.