Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Lauderhill, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Lauderhill, FL.
| Data | Parker | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 73,633 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $48,523 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Lauderhill
- The population in Lauderhill is higher at 73,633, compared to 61,222 in Parker.
- The median age in Lauderhill is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $48,523 in Lauderhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 28.0% in Lauderhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Lauderhill at 16%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Parker and Lauderhill at 3.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Lauderhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 80 |
| White | 73 | 3 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Lauderhill
- In Lauderhill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 80% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 3% in Lauderhill.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 2% in Lauderhill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 12% compared to 9% in Lauderhill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 6% in Lauderhill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Lauderhill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Lauderhill
- In Lauderhill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Lauderhill.
- Lauderhill has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 12.1% in Lauderhill.
- Lauderhill has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lauderhill at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 2.1% (1,544) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 22.7% (16,679) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 10.9% (8,046) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 13.4% (9,833) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Lauderhill
- In Lauderhill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- In Lauderhill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lauderhill at 10.9%, compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 13.4% in Lauderhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.