Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Broadalbin, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Broadalbin, NY.
| Data | Parker | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 5,158 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Broadalbin
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 5,158 in Broadalbin.
- The median age in Broadalbin is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $60,000 in Broadalbin.
- In Broadalbin, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 45.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is higher in Broadalbin at 8%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Broadalbin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Broadalbin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 95 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Broadalbin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broadalbin at 95% compared to 73% in Parker.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 1% in Broadalbin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 12% compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Parker and Broadalbin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Broadalbin
- More residents in Parker report poor mental health at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 9.8% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Parker at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Broadalbin
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 6.8% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 4.4% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.