Demographics details for Parker, CO vs Bozeman, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, CO vs Bozeman, MT.
| Data | Parker | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,222 | 56,123 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 28.2 years |
| Median Income | $126,615 | $74,113 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Bozeman
- In Parker, the population is higher at 61,222, compared to 56,123 in Bozeman.
- Residents in Parker have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615 compared to $74,113 in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Parker at 45.0% compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bozeman at 9%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Parker is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Bozeman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Parker | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 86 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Parker at 2% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bozeman at 86% compared to 73% in Parker.
- The Asian population is larger in Parker at 5% compared to 2% in Bozeman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Parker at 12% compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Parker at 8% compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Parker | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 23.7% | 24.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Bozeman
- In Bozeman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bozeman at 22.8% versus 19.2% in Parker.
- Bozeman has a higher smoking rate at 12.6% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Bozeman has higher obesity rates at 24.8% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bozeman at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Parker | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (432) | 0.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (4,185) | 5.7% (3,187) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (2,679) | 2.3% (1,316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.8% (20,066) | 35.7% (20,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Parker hold a high school diploma at 6.8% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 4.4% compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 32.8% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.