Demographics details for Park ridge, NJ vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park ridge, NJ vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Park ridge | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,426 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 47.8 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $164,241 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Park ridge vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 9,426 in Park ridge.
- Residents in Park ridge have a higher median age of 47.8 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241 compared to $69,437 in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Park ridge at 50.0% compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- The poverty level is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 0% in Park ridge.
- The unemployment rate in Park ridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Park ridge vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park ridge | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 77 | 55 |
| Asian | 4 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Park ridge vs Gresham
- In Gresham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Park ridge.
- Park ridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Park ridge.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 13% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 5% in Park ridge.
- In Gresham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Park ridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park ridge | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park ridge vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 17.8% in Park ridge.
- Gresham has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 10.2% in Park ridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 18.7% in Park ridge.
- Gresham has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park ridge | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (27) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (1,169) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (549) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.8% (3,565) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park ridge vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
- In Gresham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 12.4% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park ridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.