Demographics details for Park ridge, NJ vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Park ridge, NJ vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Park ridge Baldwin park
Population 9,426 69,455
Median Age 47.8 years 37.1 years
Median Income $164,241 $76,002
Married Families 50.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 6.3

Population Comparison: Park ridge vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 9,426 in Park ridge.
  • Residents in Park ridge have a higher median age of 47.8 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241 compared to $76,002 in Baldwin park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Park ridge at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 0% in Park ridge.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.5% in Park ridge.

Demographics

Demographics Park ridge vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Park ridge Baldwin park
Black 1 1
White 77 -25
Asian 4 23
Hispanic 13 75
Two or More Races 5 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Park ridge vs Baldwin park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Park ridge and Baldwin park at 1%.
  • Park ridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 4% in Park ridge.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 13% in Park ridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 5% in Park ridge.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Park ridge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Park ridge Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 12.7%
Depression 17.8% 14.7%
Smoking 10.2% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 14.2%
Obesity 24.6% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Park ridge vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Park ridge at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher smoking rate at 11.4% compared to 10.2% in Park ridge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Park ridge at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has higher obesity rates at 29.9% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Baldwin park at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Park ridge Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.3% (27) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 12.4% (1,169) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 5.8% (549) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.8% (3,565) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Park ridge vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
  • In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 12.4% in Park ridge.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Park ridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.