Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Texarkana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Texarkana, TX.
Data | Park forest | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,954 | 35,778 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $58,907 | $48,054 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Texarkana
- The population in Texarkana is higher at 35,778, compared to 20,954 in Park forest.
- Residents in Park forest have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 37.2 years in Texarkana.
- Park forest has a higher median income of $58,907 compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- In Texarkana, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Texarkana at 15%, compared to 13% in Park forest.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 5.0% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Park forest | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Black | 72 | 39 |
White | 17 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Texarkana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 39% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Texarkana at 46% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- In Texarkana, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Park forest.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Texarkana at 4%, compared to 3% in Park forest.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Park forest at 1% compared to 0% in Texarkana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Park forest | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.6% |
Depression | 16.9% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Texarkana at 23.4% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Texarkana has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Texarkana at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Texarkana has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 37.2% in Park forest.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Park forest | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 0.9% (324) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 17.6% (6,286) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 11.9% (4,243) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 15.9% (5,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Texarkana
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.9% in Texarkana.
- In Texarkana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Texarkana at 11.9%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 15.9% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.