Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Sutherland, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Sutherland, VA.
| Data | Park forest | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,954 | 2,000 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,907 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Sutherland
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 2,000 in Sutherland.
- The median age in Sutherland is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Sutherland has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- In Sutherland, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Sutherland.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 5.0% in Sutherland.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Sutherland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park forest | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | 10 |
| White | 17 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Sutherland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 10% in Sutherland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sutherland at 80% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- In Sutherland, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Park forest.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Park forest at 7% compared to 5% in Sutherland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Park forest at 3% compared to 0% in Sutherland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Park forest at 1% compared to 0% in Sutherland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park forest | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Sutherland
- More residents in Park forest report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Park forest at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Park forest at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Park forest at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park forest at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park forest | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Sutherland
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- More residents in Park forest have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.