Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Susanville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Susanville, CA.
Data | Park forest | Susanville |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,954 | 13,707 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $58,907 | $52,997 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Susanville
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 13,707 in Susanville.
- Residents in Park forest have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
- Park forest has a higher median income of $58,907 compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
- In Susanville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- The poverty level is identical in both Park forest and Susanville at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 7.0% in Susanville.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Susanville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Park forest | Susanville |
---|---|---|
Black | 72 | 16 |
White | 17 | 29 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Susanville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 16% in Susanville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Susanville at 29% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- In Susanville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Park forest.
- Susanville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 7% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Susanville at 17%, compared to 3% in Park forest.
- In Susanville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Park forest.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Park forest | Susanville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.1% |
Depression | 16.9% | 18.1% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Susanville
- In Susanville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Susanville at 18.1% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Susanville has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Susanville at 18.5% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park forest at 37.2% compared to 32.9% in Susanville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Susanville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Park forest | Susanville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 1.2% (170) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 19.1% (2,613) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 39.3% (5,387) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 7.0% (962) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Susanville
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.2% in Susanville.
- In Susanville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Susanville at 39.3%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.