Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Hornick, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Hornick, IA.
Data | Park forest | Hornick |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,954 | 253 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $58,907 | $78,750 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Hornick
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 253 in Hornick.
- Residents in Park forest have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 32.8 years in Hornick.
- Hornick has a higher median income of $78,750, compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- In Hornick, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Hornick.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 3.0% in Hornick.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Hornick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Park forest | Hornick |
---|---|---|
Black | 72 | Data is updating |
White | 17 | 96 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Hornick
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 0% in Hornick.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hornick at 96% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- Both Park forest and Hornick have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Park forest at 7% compared to 1% in Hornick.
- Both Park forest and Hornick have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Park forest at 1% compared to 0% in Hornick.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Park forest | Hornick |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 9.9% |
Depression | 16.9% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 23.2% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Hornick
- More residents in Park forest report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.3% in Hornick.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hornick at 20.4% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Hornick has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hornick at 23.2% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park forest at 37.2% compared to 36.5% in Hornick.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 4.0% in Hornick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Park forest | Hornick |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 24.9% (63) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 11.9% (30) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 4.7% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Hornick
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Hornick.
- In Hornick, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hornick at 11.9%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 4.7% in Hornick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.