Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Fall branch, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Fall branch, TN.
| Data | Park forest | Fall branch |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,954 | 984 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 48.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,907 | $41,884 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Fall branch
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 984 in Fall branch.
- The median age in Fall branch is higher at 48.9 years, compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher median income of $58,907 compared to $41,884 in Fall branch.
- In Fall branch, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Fall branch.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 3.5% in Fall branch.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Fall branch provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park forest | Fall branch |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | Data is updating |
| White | 17 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Fall branch
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 0% in Fall branch.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fall branch at 100% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- Both Park forest and Fall branch have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Park forest at 7% compared to 0% in Fall branch.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Park forest at 3% compared to 0% in Fall branch.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Park forest at 1% compared to 0% in Fall branch.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park forest | Fall branch |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Fall branch
- In Fall branch, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fall branch at 28.3% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Fall branch has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fall branch at 16.7% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park forest at 37.2% compared to 28.9% in Fall branch.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fall branch at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Park forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park forest | Fall branch |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 1.7% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 24.5% (241) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 19.7% (194) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 14.4% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Fall branch
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.7% in Fall branch.
- In Fall branch, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fall branch at 19.7%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 14.4% in Fall branch.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.