Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Edna, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Edna, TX.
| Data | Park forest | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,954 | 6,009 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,907 | $60,361 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Edna
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 6,009 in Edna.
- The median age in Edna is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Edna has a higher median income of $60,361, compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- In Edna, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Edna.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 3.2% in Edna.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Edna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park forest | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | 12 |
| White | 17 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Edna
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 12% in Edna.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Edna at 41% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- Both Park forest and Edna have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Edna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 7% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edna at 9%, compared to 3% in Park forest.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Park forest at 1% compared to 0% in Edna.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park forest | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Edna
- In Edna, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edna at 22.8% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Edna has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Edna at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Edna has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 37.2% in Park forest.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Edna at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Park forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park forest | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 3.0% (182) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 19.7% (1,186) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 28.2% (1,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 8.4% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Edna
- In Edna, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.4% in Park forest.
- In Edna, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edna at 28.2%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 8.4% in Edna.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.