Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Chester, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Chester, VA.
| Data | Park forest | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,954 | 23,068 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,907 | $87,242 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Chester
- The population in Chester is higher at 23,068, compared to 20,954 in Park forest.
- The median age in Chester is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Chester has a higher median income of $87,242, compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- In Chester, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Chester.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 3.5% in Chester.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Chester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park forest | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | 25 |
| White | 17 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Chester
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 25% in Chester.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chester at 55% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- In Chester, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Park forest.
- Chester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chester at 6%, compared to 3% in Park forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Park forest and Chester at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park forest | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Chester
- In Chester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chester at 21.3% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Park forest at 15.9% compared to 15.3% in Chester.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chester at 18.4% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park forest at 37.2% compared to 36.5% in Chester.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park forest | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 1.5% (344) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 16.8% (3,871) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 11.9% (2,738) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 22.3% (5,134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Chester
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.5% in Chester.
- In Chester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chester at 11.9%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- In Chester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 17.4% in Park forest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.