Demographics details for Park forest, IL vs Attica, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park forest, IL vs Attica, KS.
| Data | Park forest | Attica |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,954 | 500 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $58,907 | $42,422 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Park forest vs Attica
- In Park forest, the population is higher at 20,954, compared to 500 in Attica.
- The median age in Attica is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher median income of $58,907 compared to $42,422 in Attica.
- In Attica, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Attica.
- The unemployment rate in Park forest is higher at 8.9%, compared to 3.5% in Attica.
Demographics
Demographics Park forest vs Attica provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park forest | Attica |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | Data is updating |
| White | 17 | 64 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Park forest vs Attica
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Park forest at 72% compared to 0% in Attica.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Attica at 64% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- Both Park forest and Attica have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Attica has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 7% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Attica at 9%, compared to 3% in Park forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Park forest and Attica at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park forest | Attica |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park forest vs Attica
- In Attica, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Attica at 22.6% versus 16.9% in Park forest.
- Attica has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Attica at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Attica has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 37.2% in Park forest.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Attica at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Park forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park forest | Attica |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (503) | 2.6% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (2,802) | 25.8% (129) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (1,787) | 21.2% (106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,650) | 13.6% (68) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park forest vs Attica
- In Attica, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.4% in Park forest.
- In Attica, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Attica at 21.2%, compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 13.6% in Attica.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.