Demographics details for Paris, IL vs Forrest city, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paris, IL vs Forrest city, AR.
| Data | Paris | Forrest city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,084 | 12,676 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $50,080 | $36,368 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Paris vs Forrest city
- The population in Forrest city is higher at 12,676, compared to 8,084 in Paris.
- Residents in Paris have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
- Paris has a higher median income of $50,080 compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paris at 46.0% compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
- The poverty level is higher in Forrest city at 20%, compared to 12% in Paris.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Paris and Forrest city at 6.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Paris vs Forrest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paris | Forrest city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 73 |
| White | 96 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Paris vs Forrest city
- In Forrest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 1% in Paris.
- Paris has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
- Both Paris and Forrest city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Forrest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Paris.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forrest city at 4%, compared to 1% in Paris.
- In Forrest city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Paris.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paris | Forrest city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 16.5% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 49.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paris vs Forrest city
- In Forrest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Paris.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paris at 22.9% compared to 21.2% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 18.8% in Paris.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paris at 18.0% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has higher obesity rates at 49.7% compared to 36.1% in Paris.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paris at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Forrest city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paris | Forrest city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (157) | 0.8% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 23.3% (1,881) | 21.3% (2,698) |
| Less than High School | 25.1% (2,033) | 17.7% (2,241) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,035) | 8.9% (1,122) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paris vs Forrest city
- A higher percentage of residents in Paris have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Forrest city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paris hold a high school diploma at 23.3% compared to 21.3% in Forrest city.
- More residents in Paris have less than a high school education at 25.1% compared to 17.7% in Forrest city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paris hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.