Demographics details for Paramus, NJ vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paramus, NJ vs Chesapeake, VA.
| Data | Paramus | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,359 | 252,488 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $136,824 | $92,703 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Paramus vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 26,359 in Paramus.
- Residents in Paramus have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Paramus has a higher median income of $136,824 compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paramus at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
- The poverty level is higher in Chesapeake at 8%, compared to 4% in Paramus.
- The unemployment rate in Paramus is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Paramus vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paramus | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 29 |
| White | 50 | 53 |
| Asian | 24 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paramus vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 3% in Paramus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chesapeake at 53% compared to 50% in Paramus.
- The Asian population is larger in Paramus at 24% compared to 4% in Chesapeake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paramus at 14% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paramus at 8% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Paramus at 1% compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paramus | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 16.1% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 22.8% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paramus vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Paramus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chesapeake at 20.9% versus 16.1% in Paramus.
- Chesapeake has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 10.9% in Paramus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paramus at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 22.8% in Paramus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Paramus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paramus | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (194) | 0.8% (2,039) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,006) | 13.1% (33,024) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (1,764) | 7.0% (17,684) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.1% (9,785) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paramus vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Paramus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramus hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chesapeake at 7.0%, compared to 6.7% in Paramus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.1% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.