Demographics details for Paramount, CA vs Farmington, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paramount, CA vs Farmington, MN.
| Data | Paramount | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,653 | 23,566 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $67,197 | $114,737 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Paramount vs Farmington
- In Paramount, the population is higher at 51,653, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 31.9 years in Paramount.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $67,197 in Paramount.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Paramount.
- Paramount has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Paramount is higher at 6.4%, compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Paramount vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paramount | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 3 |
| White | -20 | 85 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paramount vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paramount at 9% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to -20% in Paramount.
- The Asian population is larger in Paramount at 4% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paramount at 84% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paramount at 21% compared to 4% in Farmington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Paramount at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paramount | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 16.2% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 13.3% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 31.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paramount vs Farmington
- More residents in Paramount report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 22.6% versus 16.2% in Paramount.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 13.3% in Paramount.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Paramount.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paramount at 34.2% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paramount at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paramount | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.0% (2,572) | 0.4% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,418) | 11.3% (2,674) |
| Less than High School | 42.4% (21,924) | 7.1% (1,662) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (4,297) | 23.4% (5,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paramount vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramount have no formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramount hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in Paramount have less than a high school education at 42.4% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 8.3% in Paramount.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.