Demographics details for Pangburn, AR vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pangburn, AR vs Tullahoma, TN.
| Data | Pangburn | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 503 | 20,830 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $29,024 | $56,771 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pangburn vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- Residents in Pangburn have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771, compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pangburn at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Tullahoma.
- Pangburn has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- The unemployment rate in Pangburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Pangburn vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pangburn | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 94 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pangburn vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 83% in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Pangburn.
- Tullahoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pangburn at 6% compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pangburn and Tullahoma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pangburn | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pangburn vs Tullahoma
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Pangburn and Tullahoma at 19.9%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 27.4% in Pangburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pangburn at 24.3% compared to 22.6% in Tullahoma.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Pangburn and Tullahoma at 15.1%.
- Tullahoma has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 36.5% in Pangburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 19.0% in Tullahoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pangburn | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 35.8% (180) | 18.9% (3,932) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (61) | 14.1% (2,944) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (40) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pangburn vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn hold a high school diploma at 35.8% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tullahoma at 14.1%, compared to 12.1% in Pangburn.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 8.0% in Pangburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.