Demographics details for Pangburn, AR vs Selma, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pangburn, AR vs Selma, CA.
| Data | Pangburn | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 503 | 24,430 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $29,024 | $53,874 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Pangburn vs Selma
- The population in Selma is higher at 24,430, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- Residents in Pangburn have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Selma has a higher median income of $53,874, compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pangburn at 42.0% compared to 30.0% in Selma.
- The poverty level is higher in Selma at 20%, compared to 18% in Pangburn.
- Selma has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Pangburn.
Demographics
Demographics Pangburn vs Selma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pangburn | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 94 | -2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pangburn vs Selma
- In Selma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to -2% in Selma.
- In Selma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Pangburn.
- Selma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Selma at 13%, compared to 6% in Pangburn.
- In Selma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pangburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pangburn | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pangburn vs Selma
- More residents in Pangburn report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Selma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pangburn at 27.4% compared to 17.4% in Selma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pangburn at 24.3% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pangburn at 15.1% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Selma has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 36.5% in Pangburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in Selma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pangburn | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 3.8% (938) |
| High School Diploma | 35.8% (180) | 14.6% (3,577) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (61) | 33.9% (8,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (40) | 7.0% (1,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pangburn vs Selma
- In Selma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.4% in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn hold a high school diploma at 35.8% compared to 14.6% in Selma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Selma at 33.9%, compared to 12.1% in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.