Demographics details for Pangburn, AR vs Lafayette, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pangburn, AR vs Lafayette, CA.
| Data | Pangburn | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 503 | 25,044 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $29,024 | $219,250 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Pangburn vs Lafayette
- The population in Lafayette is higher at 25,044, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- The median age in Lafayette is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 40.4 years in Pangburn.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $219,250, compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- In Lafayette, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 42.0% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 2% in Lafayette.
- The unemployment rate in Pangburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Lafayette.
Demographics
Demographics Pangburn vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pangburn | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 94 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 10 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pangburn vs Lafayette
- In Lafayette, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 71% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Pangburn.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lafayette at 10%, compared to 6% in Pangburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pangburn and Lafayette at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pangburn | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 6.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 21.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pangburn vs Lafayette
- More residents in Pangburn report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 12.5% in Lafayette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pangburn at 27.4% compared to 17.5% in Lafayette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pangburn at 24.3% compared to 6.6% in Lafayette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lafayette at 18.7% compared to 15.1% in Pangburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pangburn at 36.5% compared to 21.1% in Lafayette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 7.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pangburn | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.3% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 35.8% (180) | 3.3% (814) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (61) | 2.1% (526) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (40) | 53.4% (13,378) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pangburn vs Lafayette
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn hold a high school diploma at 35.8% compared to 3.3% in Lafayette.
- More residents in Pangburn have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 2.1% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.4% compared to 8.0% in Pangburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.