Demographics details for Pangburn, AR vs Hickman, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pangburn, AR vs Hickman, TN.
| Data | Pangburn | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 503 | 25,455 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $29,024 | $54,669 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Pangburn vs Hickman
- The population in Hickman is higher at 25,455, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- The median age in Hickman is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 40.4 years in Pangburn.
- Hickman has a higher median income of $54,669, compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pangburn at 42.0% compared to 40.0% in Hickman.
- Pangburn has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Hickman.
- The unemployment rate in Pangburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Hickman.
Demographics
Demographics Pangburn vs Hickman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pangburn | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 94 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pangburn vs Hickman
- In Hickman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 89% in Hickman.
- In Hickman, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Pangburn.
- Hickman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pangburn at 6% compared to 4% in Hickman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pangburn and Hickman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pangburn | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pangburn vs Hickman
- More residents in Pangburn report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Hickman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hickman at 28.4% versus 27.4% in Pangburn.
- Hickman has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 24.3% in Pangburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hickman at 16.2% compared to 15.1% in Pangburn.
- Hickman has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 36.5% in Pangburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 17.0% in Hickman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pangburn | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.7% (185) |
| High School Diploma | 35.8% (180) | 22.0% (5,594) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (61) | 23.4% (5,965) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (40) | 8.7% (2,226) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pangburn vs Hickman
- In Hickman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pangburn hold a high school diploma at 35.8% compared to 22.0% in Hickman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hickman at 23.4%, compared to 12.1% in Pangburn.
- In Hickman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 8.0% in Pangburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.