Demographics details for Panama, OK vs Lake leelanau, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panama, OK vs Lake leelanau, MI.
Data | Panama | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,284 | 165 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 27.9 years |
Median Income | $44,397 | $48,125 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Panama vs Lake leelanau
- In Panama, the population is higher at 1,284, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
- Residents in Panama have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
- Lake leelanau has a higher median income of $48,125, compared to $44,397 in Panama.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Panama at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
- Panama has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
- Lake leelanau has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Panama.
Demographics
Demographics Panama vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Panama | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 100 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 19 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 8 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panama vs Lake leelanau
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Panama and Lake leelanau at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 68% in Panama.
- The Asian population is larger in Panama at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Panama at 3% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Panama at 19% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Panama at 8% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Panama | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 8.4% |
Depression | 27.3% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 25.1% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 42.5% | 31.7% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panama vs Lake leelanau
- More residents in Panama report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panama at 27.3% compared to 22.5% in Lake leelanau.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panama at 25.1% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Panama.
- Obesity rates are higher in Panama at 42.5% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Panama.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Panama | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.4% (4) |
High School Diploma | 29.5% (379) | 13.3% (22) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (175) | 4.8% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.4% (56) | 13.9% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panama vs Lake leelanau
- In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Panama.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panama hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents in Panama have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
- In Lake leelanau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 4.4% in Panama.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.