Demographics details for Panama, OK vs Averill park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panama, OK vs Averill park, NY.
| Data | Panama | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,284 | 1,608 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 53.3 years |
| Median Income | $44,397 | $109,746 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Panama vs Averill park
- The population in Averill park is higher at 1,608, compared to 1,284 in Panama.
- The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 32.4 years in Panama.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $44,397 in Panama.
- In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Panama.
- Panama has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Averill park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Panama and Averill park at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Panama vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Panama | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 68 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 19 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 8 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panama vs Averill park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Panama and Averill park at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 68% in Panama.
- The Asian population is larger in Panama at 2% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Panama at 3% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Panama at 19% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Panama at 8% compared to 0% in Averill park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Panama | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 42.5% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panama vs Averill park
- More residents in Panama report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panama at 27.3% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panama at 25.1% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 14.1% in Panama.
- Obesity rates are higher in Panama at 42.5% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panama at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Panama | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (379) | 22.0% (354) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (175) | 3.7% (60) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.4% (56) | 32.3% (520) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panama vs Averill park
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Panama and Averill park at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panama hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 22.0% in Averill park.
- More residents in Panama have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 4.4% in Panama.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.