Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs North branford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs North branford, CT.
Data | Panacea | North branford |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,152 | 14,158 |
Median Age | 46.7 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $36,250 | $74,000 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs North branford
- The population in North branford is higher at 14,158, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 42.0 years in North branford.
- North branford has a higher median income of $74,000, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- In North branford, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in North branford.
- The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.0% in North branford.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs North branford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Panacea | North branford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 99 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs North branford
- In North branford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 90% in North branford.
- In North branford, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Panacea.
- North branford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in North branford at 2%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and North branford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Panacea | North branford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 22.3% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 23.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.3% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 31.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs North branford
- More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Panacea at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Panacea at 32.3% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Panacea | North branford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs North branford
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in North branford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.