Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Muscadine, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Muscadine, AL.

Data Panacea Muscadine
Population 1,152 104
Median Age 46.7 years 38.0 years
Median Income $36,250 $50,000
Married Families 30.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Panacea vs Muscadine

  • In Panacea, the population is higher at 1,152, compared to 104 in Muscadine.
  • Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 38.0 years in Muscadine.
  • Muscadine has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Panacea at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Muscadine.
  • The poverty level is higher in Muscadine at 12%, compared to 10% in Panacea.
  • The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Muscadine.

Demographics

Demographics Panacea vs Muscadine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Panacea Muscadine
Black Data is updating 15
White 99 80
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Muscadine

  • In Muscadine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Panacea.
  • Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 80% in Muscadine.
  • Both Panacea and Muscadine have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Muscadine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Panacea at 1% compared to 0% in Muscadine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Muscadine at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Panacea Muscadine
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% Data is updating%
Depression 22.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 23.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 31.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Muscadine

  • More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Panacea at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Panacea at 32.3% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Panacea Muscadine
No Schooling 4.1% (47) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 32.5% (374) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 55.4% (638) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.9% (137) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Muscadine

  • A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.