Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Kingston, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Kingston, GA.
Data | Panacea | Kingston |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,152 | 742 |
Median Age | 46.7 years | 43.3 years |
Median Income | $36,250 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs Kingston
- In Panacea, the population is higher at 1,152, compared to 742 in Kingston.
- Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 43.3 years in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Panacea at 30.0% compared to 29.0% in Kingston.
- Panacea has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Kingston.
- The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Kingston.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs Kingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Panacea | Kingston |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 30 |
White | 99 | 53 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Kingston
- In Kingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 53% in Kingston.
- Both Panacea and Kingston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Kingston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingston at 11%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Kingston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Panacea | Kingston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 22.3% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 35.1% |
Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Kingston
- More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Kingston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 22.2% in Kingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 18.2% in Kingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Panacea at 17.4% compared to 16.1% in Kingston.
- Kingston has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Kingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Panacea | Kingston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 1.9% (14) |
High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 19.1% (142) |
Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 26.8% (199) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 3.1% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Kingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.9% in Kingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 19.1% in Kingston.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 26.8% in Kingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 3.1% in Kingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.