Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Grafton, WI.
| Data | Panacea | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,152 | 12,433 |
| Median Age | 46.7 years | 43.8 years |
| Median Income | $36,250 | $83,500 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs Grafton
- The population in Grafton is higher at 12,433, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 43.8 years in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- In Grafton, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Panacea | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 99 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Grafton
- In Grafton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 87% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Panacea.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grafton at 5%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Panacea | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Grafton
- More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 21.0% in Grafton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 17.4% in Panacea.
- Obesity rates are higher in Panacea at 32.3% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Panacea | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 12.9% (1,600) |
| Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 3.1% (384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.9% in Panacea.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.