Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Corwith, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Corwith, IA.
| Data | Panacea | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,152 | 265 |
| Median Age | 46.7 years | 48.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,250 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs Corwith
- In Panacea, the population is higher at 1,152, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- The median age in Corwith is higher at 48.9 years, compared to 46.7 years in Panacea.
- Corwith has a higher median income of $48,125, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- In Corwith, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs Corwith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Panacea | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 99 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Corwith
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Panacea and Corwith at 0%.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 94% in Corwith.
- Both Panacea and Corwith have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Corwith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corwith at 5%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Corwith at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Panacea | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Corwith
- More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Corwith.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 18.7% in Corwith.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 18.8% in Corwith.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 17.4% in Panacea.
- Corwith has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 20.0% in Corwith.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Panacea | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 2.6% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 26.8% (71) |
| Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 22.3% (59) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 7.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Corwith
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 2.6% in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 26.8% in Corwith.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 22.3% in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.