Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Charlotte, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Charlotte, NC.
| Data | Panacea | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,152 | 897,720 |
| Median Age | 46.7 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,250 | $74,070 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs Charlotte
- The population in Charlotte is higher at 897,720, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- The poverty level is higher in Charlotte at 12%, compared to 10% in Panacea.
- The unemployment rate in Panacea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Panacea | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 34 |
| White | 99 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
- In Charlotte, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Panacea.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charlotte at 7%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Charlotte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Panacea | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Charlotte
- More residents in Panacea report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Panacea at 22.3% compared to 20.1% in Charlotte.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Panacea at 23.5% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 17.4% in Panacea.
- Charlotte has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Panacea | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 1.2% (10,429) |
| High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 9.4% (84,002) |
| Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 10.7% (95,990) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 30.6% (274,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.2% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
- In Charlotte, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 11.9% in Panacea.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.