Demographics details for Panacea, FL vs Butler, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Panacea, FL vs Butler, PA.
| Data | Panacea | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,152 | 13,176 |
| Median Age | 46.7 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $36,250 | $39,546 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Panacea vs Butler
- The population in Butler is higher at 13,176, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- Residents in Panacea have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 38.2 years in Butler.
- Butler has a higher median income of $39,546, compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Panacea at 30.0% compared to 26.0% in Butler.
- The poverty level is higher in Butler at 12%, compared to 10% in Panacea.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Panacea and Butler at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Panacea vs Butler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Panacea | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 99 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Panacea vs Butler
- In Butler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 88% in Butler.
- In Butler, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Panacea.
- Butler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Butler at 5%, compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Panacea and Butler at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Panacea | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Panacea vs Butler
- In Butler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Panacea.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Butler at 24.4% versus 22.3% in Panacea.
- Butler has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 23.5% in Panacea.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Panacea and Butler at 17.4%.
- Butler has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 23.0% in Butler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Panacea | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.1% (47) | 0.1% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 32.5% (374) | 23.6% (3,115) |
| Less than High School | 55.4% (638) | 9.3% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (137) | 15.6% (2,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Panacea vs Butler
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.1% in Butler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Panacea hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 23.6% in Butler.
- More residents in Panacea have less than a high school education at 55.4% compared to 9.3% in Butler.
- In Butler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 11.9% in Panacea.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.