Demographics details for Pana, IL vs Union city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pana, IL vs Union city, PA.
Data | Pana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,093 | 2,887 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $47,763 | $41,764 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Pana vs Union city
- In Pana, the population is higher at 5,093, compared to 2,887 in Union city.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 41.7 years in Pana.
- Pana has a higher median income of $47,763 compared to $41,764 in Union city.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 12%, compared to 10% in Pana.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pana and Union city at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Pana vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 93 | 91 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pana vs Union city
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pana and Union city at 0%.
- Pana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 91% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Pana at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 5%, compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pana and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.5% |
Depression | 22.8% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 39.2% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pana vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.9% in Pana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union city at 24.6% versus 22.8% in Pana.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 21.3% in Pana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union city at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Pana.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 39.1% in Pana.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Pana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pana | Union city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (21) | 0.3% (9) |
High School Diploma | 30.7% (1,563) | 42.5% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (870) | 16.5% (476) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (559) | 8.2% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pana vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Pana have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.5% compared to 30.7% in Pana.
- More residents in Pana have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 16.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 8.2% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.