Demographics details for Pana, IL vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pana, IL vs Central city, KY.
Data | Pana | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,093 | 5,810 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $47,763 | $52,184 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pana vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 5,093 in Pana.
- Residents in Pana have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 10% in Pana.
- The unemployment rate in Pana is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Pana vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pana | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 93 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pana vs Central city
- In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Pana.
- Pana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 88% in Central city.
- The Asian population is larger in Pana at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pana at 3% compared to 2% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 3% in Pana.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pana | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.5% |
Depression | 22.8% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pana vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.9% in Pana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 22.8% in Pana.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 21.3% in Pana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pana at 17.5% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 39.1% in Pana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pana at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pana | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (21) | 1.1% (65) |
High School Diploma | 30.7% (1,563) | 15.4% (897) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (870) | 15.6% (905) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (559) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pana vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Pana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pana hold a high school diploma at 30.7% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Pana have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.