Demographics details for Pampa, TX vs Apalachicola, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pampa, TX vs Apalachicola, FL.
| Data | Pampa | Apalachicola |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,612 | 2,395 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 53.8 years |
| Median Income | $52,966 | $61,322 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pampa vs Apalachicola
- In Pampa, the population is higher at 16,612, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
- The median age in Apalachicola is higher at 53.8 years, compared to 35.5 years in Pampa.
- Apalachicola has a higher median income of $61,322, compared to $52,966 in Pampa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pampa at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Apalachicola.
- The poverty level is higher in Apalachicola at 18%, compared to 14% in Pampa.
- Apalachicola has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Pampa.
Demographics
Demographics Pampa vs Apalachicola provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pampa | Apalachicola |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 27 |
| White | 53 | 65 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pampa vs Apalachicola
- In Apalachicola, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 3% in Pampa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Apalachicola at 65% compared to 53% in Pampa.
- The Asian population is larger in Pampa at 2% compared to 1% in Apalachicola.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pampa at 34% compared to 2% in Apalachicola.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pampa at 7% compared to 5% in Apalachicola.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pampa at 1% compared to 0% in Apalachicola.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pampa | Apalachicola |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pampa vs Apalachicola
- More residents in Pampa report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Apalachicola.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pampa at 25.4% compared to 19.8% in Apalachicola.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pampa at 21.1% compared to 20.1% in Apalachicola.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pampa at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Apalachicola.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pampa at 39.7% compared to 37.8% in Apalachicola.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Pampa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pampa | Apalachicola |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (238) | 1.0% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,443) | 19.2% (461) |
| Less than High School | 24.0% (3,994) | 29.5% (707) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,757) | 26.2% (627) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pampa vs Apalachicola
- A higher percentage of residents in Pampa have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Apalachicola.
- In Apalachicola, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 14.7% in Pampa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apalachicola at 29.5%, compared to 24.0% in Pampa.
- In Apalachicola, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 10.6% in Pampa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.