Demographics details for Pampa, TX vs American canyon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pampa, TX vs American canyon, CA.
Data | Pampa | American canyon |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,612 | 21,432 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $52,966 | $122,694 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pampa vs American canyon
- The population in American canyon is higher at 21,432, compared to 16,612 in Pampa.
- The median age in American canyon is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 35.5 years in Pampa.
- American canyon has a higher median income of $122,694, compared to $52,966 in Pampa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pampa at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in American canyon.
- Pampa has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 7% in American canyon.
- American canyon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Pampa.
Demographics
Demographics Pampa vs American canyon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pampa | American canyon |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 53 | 17 |
Asian | 2 | 35 |
Hispanic | 34 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pampa vs American canyon
- In American canyon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Pampa.
- Pampa has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 17% in American canyon.
- In American canyon, the Asian population stands at 35%, greater than 2% in Pampa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pampa at 34% compared to 29% in American canyon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in American canyon at 12%, compared to 7% in Pampa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pampa and American canyon at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pampa | American canyon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 14.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.3% |
Depression | 25.4% | 15.6% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 10.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 24.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pampa vs American canyon
- More residents in Pampa report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.1% in American canyon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pampa at 25.4% compared to 15.6% in American canyon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pampa at 21.1% compared to 10.6% in American canyon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pampa at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in American canyon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pampa at 39.7% compared to 24.8% in American canyon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pampa at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in American canyon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pampa | American canyon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (238) | 2.3% (502) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,443) | 10.5% (2,261) |
Less than High School | 24.0% (3,994) | 15.9% (3,397) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,757) | 21.8% (4,672) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pampa vs American canyon
- In American canyon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.4% in Pampa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pampa hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 10.5% in American canyon.
- More residents in Pampa have less than a high school education at 24.0% compared to 15.9% in American canyon.
- In American canyon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 10.6% in Pampa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.